Sample Deliverable — All data is illustrative and does not represent actual research findings

Phase 2: Positioning Recommendation

Which market position can Quill credibly and distinctively own — and what's the evidence?
Quill Market Positioning Research · Phase 2 · Sample Output

Executive Summary

Recommended Market Position

"The business supply partner where you talk to real people who know your account — not a chatbot, not a call center, not a help article."
PositionQuill is the supplier built around human expertise and account-level knowledge. You're not a number — you're a business they know.
Lead RTB250+ dedicated reps who know your order history, your business, and your name. Phone-first service model.
Supporting RTBBusiness-grade infrastructure: Net 30 invoicing, punchout integration, 100K+ SKUs across every category your business needs.
Supporting RTBRewards on every order that prove the relationship pays for itself — points, savings, and proof of value.
Proof Points"Call and get a person in under 60 seconds." Monthly savings reports. Category expertise across office, breakroom, facilities, tech, and print.

Reminder

This recommendation, all territories, win rates, quotes, and data are illustrative. They show the shape of the actual deliverable.

Head-to-Head Results

Every territory pair was tested. Participants chose between two positioning descriptions and explained why.

68%
"Real People" beat "Built for Business" in head-to-head
71%
"Real People" beat "Makes You Look Good" in head-to-head
54%
"Built for Business" beat "Makes You Look Good" — closer margin
Open ranking — all territories
% who ranked each territory #1 (illustrative)

Why "Real People" wins

Participants consistently said the same thing: every supplier claims to have good prices and fast shipping. The difference is what happens when something goes wrong. "Real People" was the only territory that made participants say "I would switch for this" rather than "that's nice." The emotional weight of "someone who knows my account" was stronger than any functional benefit.

Competitive Stress Test

We took each participant's top territory and tested it against Amazon and Staples. Does the position hold up?

Stress test vs. Amazon
% who said Quill could own this claim even knowing Amazon exists (illustrative)
Stress test vs. Staples
% who said Quill could own this claim even knowing Staples exists (illustrative)

Defensibility finding

"Real People" survived competitive pressure at 78% against Amazon and 72% against Staples. Participants said Amazon "will never have reps for small businesses" and Staples "used to but doesn't anymore." "Built for Business" was weaker against Staples (61%) because participants associate Staples with business purchasing already. "Makes You Look Good" was the most vulnerable — participants struggled to explain why one supplier would be better than another at this.

Segment-Level Positioning Map

Where the winning position is strongest — and where it needs to flex.

"Real People" win rate by vertical
% who ranked it #1 in open ranking, by vertical (illustrative)
"Real People" win rate by title group
% who ranked it #1, by title (illustrative)

Where it flexes

The position is strongest in healthcare (52%) and education (48%) — verticals where procurement errors have real consequences. It's weakest with Owner/CEOs (28%) who are more price-driven. For owner-heavy segments, the "Built for Business" frame with "Real People" as the lead RTB may land better than leading with the human service angle directly. Phase 3 message testing can optimize this.

Territories Tested and Rejected

What didn't win — and whether any elements should be carried forward.

"Built for How Businesses Actually Buy"

Lost to "Real People" 68-32 in head-to-head

Strong with finance (61% ranked it #1) and ops/logistics (58%), but the broader market found it too functional. "Built for business" described infrastructure, not a relationship. Participants said it sounded like "a feature list, not a reason to care."

Carry forward as: Supporting RTB. The business-grade features (Net 30, punchout, breadth) are proof points that make "Real People" credible as a business-focused position, not just a warm-fuzzy service claim.

"Makes You Look Good to Your Boss"

Lost to both other territories. Weakest competitive defensibility.

Emotionally resonant with admins and office managers but too narrow for a market position. Participants couldn't articulate why one supplier would be better than another at this. The emotional insight is real — but it works better as messaging beneath a position than as the position itself.

Carry forward as: Messaging angle for admin/office manager audience segments. "The supplier that makes your job easier and makes you look good" is a compelling ad hook, even if it's not the strategic position.

What This Means for GTM and Media

How the positioning translates into go-to-market decisions.

Upper-funnel messaging direction

Lead with the human connection. The core message is: "When you call Quill, a real person picks up — and they already know your business." Every ad, landing page, and CTV spot should make the viewer feel the contrast between the transactional experience they have now and the relationship-based experience Quill offers.

Proof points to feature: dedicated reps, phone-first service, rewards that prove the relationship pays for itself. Do not lead with business infrastructure (Net 30, punchout) — use those as credibility signals that land after the emotional hook.

Segment-specific recommendations

SegmentLead WithEmphasizeTone
Healthcare, Education"Real People" directlyAccount knowledge, error prevention, reliabilityReassuring, dependable
Industrial, Government"Built for Business" frame with "Real People" as lead RTBNet 30, bulk capabilities, dedicated repsProfessional, efficient
Admins, Office Managers"Makes your job easier"The relationship makes you look competent to leadershipEmpathetic, empowering
Owners, FinanceSavings proof + business infrastructureROI, price match, transparent valueDirect, no-nonsense

Business-focused vs. small-business-focused mindset

72% of participants identified as "a business" rather than "a small business." Those who rejected the "small business" label said it felt patronizing — "we're not small, we're just not Fortune 500." The positioning should speak to businesses of all sizes without the "small" qualifier. When participants heard "built for businesses like yours," it resonated more than "built for small businesses."

Recommended Phase 3

Message testing. The position is clear and defensible. The next step is optimizing the creative expression — testing 3-5 executional versions (taglines, video concepts, value prop statements) against the core target to see which language drives the strongest engagement in upper-funnel media.

Methodology

700 conversational AI interviews with SMB decision-makers (10-149 employees) across 7 verticals and 5 title groups (n=100 per vertical). Fresh sample from Phase 1. Forced-choice pairs, open ranking, and competitive stress-testing against Amazon and Staples.

700
Conversations completed
3
Territories tested head-to-head
14.1
Avg conversation length (min)

All data in this document is illustrative. It represents the structure and depth of the actual deliverable, not real findings. Fielded via Gather AI-powered conversational research platform.

0