Consumer Research Report

The Protection Gap: What 733 Consumers Reveal About Embedded Insurance

Consumers are ready to buy protection. They want it embedded, automated, and personalised. Here's the data that proves it — and what it means for travel platforms, banks, and fintechs.
April 2026 733 Respondents 7 Countries 4 Generations

Consumers are thinking about risk every time they transact. But half don't understand the protection they already have — and what they value is shifting toward everyday digital products, not just travel. The opportunity is massive. The playbook is clear: remove friction with parametric payouts, embed protection at the point of sale, and make it a loyalty lever. And the urgency is real: 75% are already open to AI-assisted purchases, and the platforms that build protection into those workflows now will own the next wave of distribution. This report lays out the opportunity, the playbook, and the case for acting now.

86%
of consumers think about risk when transacting — but 45% don't understand their existing coverage
73%
would be more likely to buy with automatic payouts — no claim filing required
75%
are open to AI-assisted purchases — but only 5% want full autonomy
1
The Opportunity

86% Think About Risk — But Gen Z Puts Device Theft Above Trip Cancellation

The demand for protection is real — 86% of consumers actively think about risk when they transact, and 81% engage seriously with offers. But the experience is failing them: nearly half don't understand the coverage they already have. And the products they value most are changing — younger generations now prioritise everyday digital protection just as highly as traditional travel staples.

The protection gap is largest among Boomers — 67% don't understand their existing coverage. And for Gen Z, device theft protection (70%) now outranks trip cancellation (65%).

Do Consumers Think About Risk When Transacting?
Q1: "When booking travel or dealing with a financial product (loan, credit card, mortgage), do you think about what could go wrong?"
What Do Consumers Do When Offered Protection?
Q2: "When offered protection or insurance as part of a booking or financial product (e.g., trip cancellation, payment protection), what do you typically do?"
How Well Do Consumers Know Their Existing Card Coverage?
Q9: "How would you describe your experience with the protection or travel benefits included with your credit card or loyalty program?"
Most Valued Travel Protection Products
Q3: "How relevant or valuable are the following travel protection products to you personally?" — % rating 'Very Relevant' or 'Essential' (4–5 on a 5-point scale). Each product was rated independently — percentages reflect individual relevance scores, not a ranked choice.
Most Valued Everyday Protection Products
Q4: "How relevant or valuable are the following everyday protection products to you personally?" — % rating 'Very Relevant' or 'Essential' (4–5 on a 5-point scale). Each product was rated independently — percentages reflect individual relevance scores, not a ranked choice.
The Generational Shift: Gen Z vs. Millennial Product Priorities
Q3 + Q4 cross-tabulated by age group: % rating 'Very Relevant' or 'Essential' — top 8 products compared

Key Insight

The protection gap is a two-part problem. First, awareness: 45% of consumers have limited understanding of their existing card benefits — rising to 67% among Boomers. Second, relevance: what consumers value most is shifting. For Gen Z, device theft (70%) outranks trip cancellation (65%). Cyber protection (66%) and shipping protection (63%) now sit in their top five. For Millennials, everyday products like device theft (75%) and shipping (72%) are nearly equal to travel staples. This isn't a seasonal travel opportunity — it's a year-round, cross-vertical one. Don't assume your customers understand their coverage, and don't limit your embedded portfolio to travel. The demand is broader, more digital, and more generationally diverse than the industry has been serving.

"Clarity about the process and the terms is most important to me, so I know exactly what will happen."

— Gen X Consumer, Germany

"I just want security and my information protected — and that's priceless."

— Millennial Consumer, United States
2
The Playbook

73% Would Buy More With Automatic Payouts. Speed Beats Empathy When Claims Happen.

The opportunity is clear. So how do you capture it — and keep it? The data reveals a two-part playbook. First, convert: automatic payouts are the single strongest purchase driver in the study, and when claims do happen, consumers want speed above all else. Second, retain: 70% would shift their booking behaviour to a platform with embedded protection, and 82% say it influences which card they hold. Conversion and retention, driven by the same thing — frictionless, embedded delivery.

Millennials respond most strongly to auto-payouts (85%), but even 58% of Boomers say it would make them more likely to buy. Speed is the #1 claims priority across every generation.

Impact of Automatic Payouts on Willingness to Buy
Q15: "How would automatic payouts affect your willingness to buy protection?" (e.g., flight delayed 3+ hours = money in your account, no claim needed)
When Something Goes Wrong: Speed vs. Clarity vs. Empathy
Q22: "If something goes wrong and you need to make a claim, what matters most: speed, clarity, or feeling like someone genuinely cares?" — keyword analysis of open-ended responses (n=682)
Would Embedded Protection Influence Where You Book?
Q17: "If platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, or Agoda included protection as a default benefit for loyalty members, would that affect where you book?"
Protection Benefits That Would Influence Card Choice or Loyalty
Q13: "What type of protection benefit would make you consider switching credit cards — or make you more loyal to your current one?" (Multi-select — totals exceed 100%)
What Gets Consumers to Say "Yes" to Protection?
Q21: "When it comes to paying for or discovering protection, what's most likely to get you to say yes?"

Key Insight

Parametric, no-claim payouts are the strongest conversion lever in the entire study — 73% say they'd be more likely to buy. Millennials index highest at 85%, but even 58% of Boomers respond positively. When claims do happen, speed is the #1 priority (31%), with Millennials leading at 35%. The competitive stakes are real: 70% would shift booking behaviour to a platform with embedded protection — rising to 78% in the US. And 82% say protection benefits influence their card choice, with travel insurance (47%) and purchase protection (41%) leading. The top purchase triggers — paying with points (25%), loyalty tier inclusion (23%), and checkout add-ons (17%) — all favour embedded distribution. For banking partners, 51% say simply explaining what's covered would make them buy. The playbook is clear: offer parametric protection, embed it at the point of sale, integrate it with loyalty programs, and make the value obvious. The barrier isn't demand — it's experience design.

"I would like it if it just did it — money in my bank very quickly without needing to make a claim."

— Boomer Consumer, Australia

"A quick, easy digital process with clear steps and updates. Speed matters most, but transparency and access to real support are also important."

— Millennial Consumer, Germany

Cover Genius's XCover platform powers embedded, parametric protection for the world's largest digital companies — from auto-payouts to personalised, contextual offers at checkout.

See how it works →
3
The Urgency

75% Are Open to AI-Assisted Purchases. Only 5% Want Full Autonomy.

The case for embedded protection is clear today. But the way consumers transact is about to change. Three-quarters are already open to AI-assisted purchasing — and the majority want protection handled as part of that workflow. But the data reveals a clear preference: they want AI to suggest and assist, not take over. The platforms that build protection into AI-native experiences now will own this channel.

Only 11% of Gen Z refuse AI involvement in purchases, versus 50% of Boomers. But across all generations, 61% want AI to actively handle protection — as long as they keep the final say.

Comfort with AI-Assisted Purchasing
Q18: "What's your comfort level with an AI assistant making purchases or booking travel on your behalf?"
How Should AI Handle Protection?
Q19: "If an AI is making a purchase on your behalf, how would you want it to handle protection for that transaction?"
Who Do Consumers Trust Most for Protection?
Q23: "Which type of company would you feel most comfortable getting protection from?"

Key Insight

The AI autonomy spectrum reveals a clear sweet spot: 30% want AI to propose options they approve, 27% want AI to recommend while they decide, and only 5% want full end-to-end autonomy. The generational divide is sharp — just 11% of Gen Z refuse AI involvement versus 50% of Boomers — but even among Gen X, 72% are open to some level of AI assistance. For protection specifically, 61% want AI actively involved, and trust flows through existing relationships: banks (40%) and booking platforms (27%) are the most trusted sources — not standalone insurers, not AI assistants. France shows surprising AI openness (86%), while Germany and the Netherlands are more cautious. The platforms that build protection into their AI-assisted workflows now — with a "suggest and approve" model, not full automation — will own the next wave of embedded distribution before competitors catch up.

"I think the most important thing is someone who actually cares and helps me with my problem, because this really makes a huge difference even if it doesn't work out in the end."

— Gen Z Consumer, Germany

"Clear guidance first, efficient handling second, and a human, empathetic tone throughout."

— Millennial Consumer, Netherlands

Ready to Embed Protection Into Your Platform?

Cover Genius powers embedded protection for the world's largest digital companies — from travel and eCommerce to banking and fintech. Through XCover, our global distribution platform, you can offer seamless, personalised protection that your customers actually want.

Learn More at covergenius.com

Methodology

This research was conducted in March–April 2026 via structured conversational surveys with 733 qualified consumers across 7 countries.

733
Respondents
7
Countries
4
Generations
23
Core Questions
Respondents by Generation
Respondents by Geography
Supplementary: Key Metrics by Generation
Supplementary: Key Metrics by Country
Note: All percentages are calculated based on unique respondents (N=733) unless otherwise stated. Multi-select questions may sum to more than 100% as respondents could choose multiple options. All respondents were screened to have engaged in at least one qualifying financial or travel activity in the prior 12 months, and to have been previously offered protection or insurance products. Generational breakdown: Millennial 34%, Boomer 24%, Gen X 24%, Gen Z 18%. Geographic breakdown: US 28%, Australia 27%, Germany 16%, Netherlands 10%, UK 9%, France 9%, Canada <1%. Card type: Basic/no annual fee (34%), Mid-tier rewards (29%), Premium (18%), Debit (15%), Not sure (4%).
0